SONY ROY
CEO BAFU USA AND
BANG, INC.
BANG STANDS FOR BOUNCE BACK AMERICA, NOT GUILTY
A SET BACK ALTHOUGH IT MAY CAUSE A STEP BACK
CAN CREATE A COMEBACK
TURN YOUR ADVERSITY INTO AN ADVANTAGE
WOULD YOU?
AFTER MY TEN YEARS OF PROBE I FOUND ONE SECRET IN AMERICA AS A FOREIGNER AND AN HAITIAN. I FOUND THAT AMERICA IS FREE FROM SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS. THAT IS MY THESIS. IF SO, WHAT HAPPEBED HERE IS ONLY FROM PEOPLE WHO DEFY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. WE HAVE PROBLEMATIC PEOPLE AND THAT IS WHY I QUESTIONED ISSUES BESIDE MY MONEY LOST THAT ARE NOT SYSTEMIC AT ALL IN AMERICA. THE NOBLE JUSTICES KNOW FULL WELL THAT AMERICA HAS NO SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS AND WE ARE WASTING TIME ON ISSUES THAT ATRE NOT MATERIAL TO THE CASE> IF WE STOP PONTIFIOCATING THEN< WE WILL ARRIVRE AT THE ISSUES AND WE WILL FIX THEM OR ALLOW THE BEST BUNCH ON THE BENCH TO FIX WHAT THEY CAN BUTM I MUST ASSERT HERE THAT SONETHING IS BROKEN. AND THAT HAS TO DO WITH PEOPLE'S RELATED ISSUES. THE LATE DR. ED DEMING INFORMED US THAT 85% OF ALL PROBLEMS STEM MED FROM THE SYTEM AND ONLY 15% FROM THE PEOPLE. IF SO, 85 % OF THESE PROBLEMS WE DO NOT HAVE IN AMERICA AS A SUPER POWER. WHAT WE ARE DEALINH WITH HERE IS PEOPLE RELATED PROBLEMS AND THAT IS GRAVE FOR 15% IS TRYING TO OVERCOME 85 % THAT MAKE US GREAT AROUND THE WORLD. THAT IS TRUE. WE ARE IMMENSELY PROTECTED AND WE ARE IMMENSELY GUARDED BY OUR BULLISTIC SYSTEM AROND US. OUR SYSTEM IS BULLET PROOF ASND WE DO NOT OME SHORT IN OUR SYSTEM. WE MUST PREVENT PEOPLE FROM MESSING SUCH A BEAUTIFUL SYSTEM AND RECOGNIZE OUR SUPERIORITY.
AUTHORITATIVE CITATION: "Nanotechnology is so new, no one is really sure what will come of it. Even so, predictions range from the ability to reproduce things like diamonds and food to the world being devoured by self-replicating nanorobots." EVERYBODY HEARS DIFFERENT RESULTS. ONE PERSON EVEN TOLD ME THAT CANCER AND DIABETES CAN BE TRANSMITTED TO HUMANS VIA NANOTECHNOLOGY. I AM NOT SURE AND I WILL GO TO THE ADAMS BUILDING THE SCIENCE DIVISION TO RESEARCH SOME MORE I CANNOT MAKE ANY INTELLIGENT DECISIONS HERE FOR I AM AT AS MUCH OF A LOSS AS PERHAPS YOU. NANO IS FOREIGN TO ME EVEN THOUGH I SPOENT 35 YEARS AS A BUSINESS CONSULTANT I CANNOT MAK OF EMIT WISE AND INTELLIGENT COMMENTS ON NANO BUT, I FALL BACK ON MY MOTHER'S RULE AGAIN. SON IN DOUBT, YOU WAIT. tTHEREFORE I DRAW A LINE TO CONCLUSION HERE, WHY USE SOMETHING IN CELL PHONES THAT CAN TORTURE PEOPLE? THE SCIENCE IS SO NEW THAT NOBODY KNOWS WHERE IT IS GOING? WHEN ONE MAJOR DRUG COMPANY STARTED WITH A DRUG, I WAS CALLED AS A CONSULTANT AND BECAUSE THE iN-VIVO TESTING DID NOT RESULT IN A HIGH ENOUGH WELL PATIENTS ALTHOUGH ACCEPTABLE BY THE FOOD AND DRUGS ADMINISTRATION (FDA), I STOPPED THE PROCESS. SON IN DOUBT, YOU WAIT. BECAUSE I WAS NOT SURE WHERE THE TESTING WOULD GO FROM THERE. SMILARLY, I WAS THE CEO OF ACCUTECH INDUSTRIES. AND SEVERAL TIMES THE QC MANAGER WOULD COME WITH A RANDOIM SAMPLING NOT ACCEPTABLE TO ME, WHERE THE QUANTITATIVE SAMPLING WAS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO ME, I REJECTED THE WHOLE PROJECT. IN DOUBT, YOU WAIT. I WISHED I WERE WITH THE WALTON COUNTY WHEN THEY WERE MAKING THEIR NEFARIOUS DECISION AGANST ME, I WOULD TELL THEM AS MYMOTHER TOLD ME , SON, IN DOUBT YOU WAIT. tHE SAME PRINCIPLE MUST APPLY HERE FOR NANO TECHNOLOGY, we are not sure how THE SIDE EFFECTS WILL TURN OUT. mY MOTHER USED TO SAY, DANS LE DOUTE ON S'ABSTIENT" MEANING WHEN YOU DOUBT OF ANYTHING THE SAFEST CALL IS TO BACK OFF. THIS IS A WELL-THOUGHT-OF ADVICE. IN CONCLUSION, THARE ARE TOO MANY DOUBTS ABOUT THE NANO TECHNOLOGY THIS IS UNSAFE FOR RIGHT NOW, UNTIL FURTHER EVIDENCE PROVES THE CONTRARY. WHAT IS THE RUSH? WAIT. IF YOU CAN WAIT AND NOT BE TIURED BY WAITING THEN THE REWARD WILL COME AT LAST. NOW SINCE ALL THE SIDE EFFECTS ARE NOT KNOWN YET. WOULD YOU SAY? MY FINAL ADVICE THEN IS TO WAIT FOR ALL RESULTS TO COME FROM THE LAB SINCE HUMAN LIVES ARE INVOLVED. WAITING IS GOLDEN IN SUCH A CASE. WHEN OUR IN-VIVO TESTING IS COMPLETE WE HAVE BLUE SKY TO GO FORWARD. UNFORTUNATELY I AM NOT ONE OF THE PLAYERS AND I HAVE NO SAY IN NANO TECHNOLOGY.
I WOULD SEND THE WHOLE PROJECT BACK FOR REVIEW BY THE ENGINEERS
No comments:
Post a Comment